Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02187
Original file (BC 2014 02187.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF: 	DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02187

					COUNSEL:  NONE

		HEARING DESIRED:  NO



APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active 
Duty, with a period of service ending 30 Sep 05, be corrected to 
include active duty time served from 21 Sep 90 to 3 Jul 91.


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

His service time from 1990-1991 should be documented on his most 
recent DD Form 214.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 14 Sep 82, the applicant initially entered the Air Force 
Reserve (USAFR).

The applicant’s military personnel records contain four DD Forms 
214, which document the following nonconsecutive periods of 
service: 

	a.  1 Oct 01 to 27 Jul 01, when he was credited with 
9 months and 27 days of active service.

	b.  7 Oct 02 to 31 Dec 02, when he was credited with 
2 months and 25 days of active service.

	c.  1 Jan 03 to 31 May 03, when he was credited with five 
months and one day of active service.

	d.  29 Dec 03 to 30 Sep 05, he was credited with one year, 
nine months, and two days of active service.

On 15 Jan 09, the applicant was relieved from his reserve 
assignment and retired, effective 11 Feb 09, and was credited 
with 23 years and 17 days of total Reserve service.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of 
primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C.


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

ARPC/DPTS recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of 
an error or an injustice.  After a review of the applicant’s 
record, all periods of service are accurately captured on his 
multiple DD Forms 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from 
Active Duty, in accordance with AFI 36-3202, Separation 
Documents.  There is not an administrative remedy to combine 
periods of service from multiple DD Forms 214 on to a single DD 
Form 214.

A complete copy of the ARPC/DPTS evaluation is at Exhibit C.


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 4 Aug 14 for review and comment within 30 days 
(Exhibit D).  As of this date, no response has been received by 
this office.


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took 
notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
(OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion 
the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice.  
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find 
no basis to recommend granting the requested relief.


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application.


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2014-02187 in Executive Session on 25 Feb 15 under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	, Panel Chair
	, Member
	, Member

The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2014-02187 was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 25 May 14, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
	Exhibit C.  Memorandum, ARPC/DPTS, dated 30 Jun 14.
Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 4 Aug 14.

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02419

    Original file (BC 2014 02419.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s DD Form 214 reflects award of the following Air Force Medals and/or Ribbons: - National Defense Service Medal - Air Force Good Conduct Medal - Air Force Outstanding Unit Award - Air Force Longevity Service Award with one Oak Leaf Cluster - Air Force Training Ribbon The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandums prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C and D. AIR FORCE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05148

    Original file (BC 2013 05148.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05148 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter with attachments prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTS recommends denial indicating there is insufficient evidence of an error or an...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02877

    Original file (BC 2014 02877.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02877 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His military records be corrected to include his Air Force Reserve time. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTS recommends...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01466

    Original file (BC 2014 01466.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01466 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: A Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be added to her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty. On 27 Jul 03, the applicant was demobilized (released from active duty) and reverted to her traditional (part-time) status as a member of the Air Force Reserve. The remaining relevant facts...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03024

    Original file (BC 2014 03024.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provided a copy of the certificate awarding him the MSM first OLC for his outstanding service for the period 15 Feb 10 through 27 Feb 14. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTS recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02257

    Original file (BC 2014 02257.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with AFI 36-2406, Officer and Enlisted Evaluation Systems, Retired or separated personnel are not eligible to apply for correction through the Evaluation Reports Appeal Board (ERAB); therefore, they must apply to the AFBCMR. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTS recommends denial indicating there...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00688

    Original file (BC 2014 00688.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00688 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect the award of the Vermont Commendation Medal. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00917

    Original file (BC 2014 00917.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s master personnel records reflect a DD Form 214, was issued for the period 22 Apr 91 and 10 Sep 91. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTS recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. A complete copy of the ARPC/DPTS evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02511

    Original file (BC 2014 02511.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02511 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her separation date be changed to August 2006 and her grade to be corrected to airman first class (E-3). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03159

    Original file (BC 2014 03159.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTS recommends denial of award of the AFEM and JMUA, indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The JMUA is only awarded to those members of the Armed Forces of the United States who were present at the time and directly participated in the service or...